Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

CJ7 · 07-11-2013, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

CBJ7, do you mean "make up facts" like NBC, ABC and CNN in regards to the Zimmerman case? Or maybe you're thinking about withholding "inconvenient details and facts" until they are unactionable, like CBS did in regards to Benghazi? Or maybe, CBJ7, you're referring to MSNBC's Al Sharpton proffering commentary on Paula Deen's "racism"?

As a news source, Fox is every bit as credible as the Kool Aid dispensing networks that pretend to be "professional" news outlets.

no, I meant what I said.

CJ7 · 07-11-2013, 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

It wouldn't have so easy for Obama to win if he didn't get 140% voter turnout in Philidelphia, 104% in St. Louis, or 110% in South Florida. Can't you smell the dead rat?

no and you cant convey your thoughts

drunk again, go sleep it off ... coloring again tomorrow

I B Hankering · 07-11-2013, 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

no, I meant what I said.

Then you "mean" you intend to remain ignorant and ill informed. Without considering Fox, and some select newspapers and British news outlets, you'll never get the whole, factual story from the remaining American, lib-retard media-news outlets.

Yssup Rider · 07-11-2013, 08:34 AM

British news outlets? CODE = TABLOIDS!

Not the Onion, Corpy?

How about Canada Free Press?

JD Barleycorn · 07-11-2013, 01:30 PM

Here is how the joke works (and we some of those that are fooled)

In the Clinton White House there was a three ring binder called "Reliable News Sources". Inside this binder were sheets of paper and each piece of paper was a name of a news source. One name per sheet. Now if the press secretary, Clinton, or Hillary went before the public and the press asks a question about the story in _____________. The democrat could say that they were unaware of any "reliable news source" that had published such a story. The trick is that knowing ahead of time what would be asked they would remove that page from the three ring binder. That way they did not have to lie outright. The "reliable sources" that they referred to was that little binder and not reality. Obama has taken that practice further and Bush never did it. Fox News has never been in that notebook and some fools get taken in easily.

Yssup Rider · 07-11-2013, 01:45 PM

Pealrs from BSwine!

OK, so you rail against anyone who disagrees and then counter with a JOKE?

You're right, some fools are taken easily. Where did they take YOU today?

CJ7 · 07-11-2013, 01:45 PM

LMAO ... people, you cant make that shit up

on second thought

i'va biggen · 07-11-2013, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Here is how the joke works (and we some of those that are fooled)

In the Clinton White House there was a three ring binder called "Reliable News Sources". Inside this binder were sheets of paper and each piece of paper was a name of a news source. One name per sheet. Now if the press secretary, Clinton, or Hillary went before the public and the press asks a question about the story in _____________. The democrat could say that they were unaware of any "reliable news source" that had published such a story. The trick is that knowing ahead of time what would be asked they would remove that page from the three ring binder. That way they did not have to lie outright. The "reliable sources" that they referred to was that little binder and not reality. Obama has taken that practice further and Bush never did it. Fox News has never been in that notebook and some fools get taken in easily.

Welcome fool looks like you have been taken in...