Topless Women in Public Not Breaking the Law, Says NYPD

[CuteOldGuy]

Ok, so NYC is at least doing something right. Here's the story.

Ladies of New York, you are free to walk bare-breasted through the city! New York City's 34,000 police officers have been instructed that, should they encounter a woman in public who is shirtless but obeying the law, they should not arrest her. This is a good step towards gender parity in public spaces.

This decision means that breast exposure is not considered public lewdness, indecent exposure, or disorderly conduct. It also notes that, should a crowd form around a topless woman, the officer should instruct the crowd to disperse and then respond appropriately if it does not. Relative coverage is no longer a factor.

This policy shift comes after several years of litigation and protest. In the 1992 case People v. Ramona Santorelli and Mary Lou Schloss, the New York Court of Appeals ruled in favor of two women who were arrested with five others for exposing their breasts in a Rochester park, holding the law void as discriminatory. The ruling was put to the test in 2005, when Jill Coccaro bared her breasts on Delancey Street in New York, citing the 1992 decision, and was detained for twelve hours. She subsequently successfully sued the city for $29,000.

In 2007, Go Topless, a national organization supporting gender equality in shirtlessness laws, established Go Topless Day. Dozens of women protest – often topless – in thirty cities around the United States, promoting equal rights to be shirtless. Protests usually include chants of “Free your breasts. Free your minds” and a song “Let ‘em Breathe” to the tune of the Beatles’ “Let it Be.”

While some who have witnessed these events have suggested that "[t]his is extreme liberalism and why America’s in decline” or “[i]t’s degrading to women,” others have been supportive. One man even said he would encourage his wife to join them.

Though bare-breasted women might shock the sensibilities of some in the public, it is encouraging to see the police responding positively to gender bias, even on such a seemingly small scale. After all, no one thinks twice about a man shirtless on a summer day. However, the female nipple or chest is still considered “lewd.” By reminding its officers of this, the NYPD is publicly declaring that it will no longer perpetuate unconstitutional gender discrimination, a standard to which all law enforcement should be held and a decision for which it should be applauded.

For more, along with a pic and a video, click here: http://www.policymic.com/articles/42...-law-says-nypd

[Glenn Quagmire]

Her mouth said no, but her body said yes... Like there are not enough rapes in NYC already..

[JD Barleycorn]

Gender parity? So when do you start wearing a dress...if you are not already wearing a dress? There are differences between the sexes. Besides I am willing to give up women's breasts if I don't have to look at moobs.

[LexusLover]

Breasts are not considered a sex organ.

[Guest032516]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Breasts are not considered a sex organ.

Neither is the buttocks. But you can't show that in public for either sex.

If something is regarded as an erogenous zone by a majority of the opposite sex, it is probably a good idea to keep it covered.

And forget the reaction of men. These women are going to be lambasted by other women far more that then will be cat-called by men.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by ExNYer

Neither is the buttocks. But you can't show that in public for either sex.

If something is regarded as an erogenous zone by a majority of the opposite sex, it is probably a good idea to keep it covered.

And forget the reaction of men. These women are going to be lambasted by other women far more that then will be cat-called by men.

Completely agree. As with many things I suspect it will have a flurry of "making a statement", and then sink into non-news. Anyone recall the last public bra-burning?

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Gender parity? So when do you start wearing a dress...if you are not already wearing a dress? There are differences between the sexes. Besides I am willing to give up women's breasts if I don't have to look at moobs.

How about junk?