Quote:
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward
He got his tax increases, but wants to back out on the cuts? Hope he likes being a lame duck because he's going to be one for the next three and a half years.
|
Correct, as I stated in another thread. The whole "Barackolypse" act is to scare voters into giving him the HOR back. Even if he does get it back, he won't be able to use it like he did in 2009-2010.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Gunn
Why do you call them "Obama Sequesters"?
President Obama put forth a good plan before Congress to avoid this mess, but in typical fashion they just refused to cooperate.
. . . The bitches refused!
|
I like the term "Barackolypse" better. Or "Obamageddon."
Really, where's the plan? BHO was supposed to present a budget for 2013 and failed. He asked for an extension until the end of March. Isn't that a coincidence?
Its pretty simple: Harry Reid is protecting the President by not picking up either of the two bills the House passed to end the sequestration because if they pass the Senate (and they probably would) BHO doesn't want to be seen vetoing them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chica Chaser
I wonder where that $20M is now diverted to?
|
Good question.
During the Woodward fiasco ("If I've lost Bob Woodward, I've lost the American middle class"), Bob said that Obama was not sending out an aircraft carrier group because of sequestration cuts. Carrier groups are not cheap. So, if Obama wanted to, in order to make significant cuts in the military, couldn't he just stand down an ACC group or two? He is the commander-in-chief. My guess he doesn't need Congressional authorization for that. So why doesn't he? He wants "surgical" cuts to Military can't he order them?