Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
645 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
389 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
273 |
George Spelvin |
260 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70672 | biomed1 | 62316 | Yssup Rider | 60189 | gman44 | 53215 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48375 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41213 | CryptKicker | 37175 | Mokoa | 36491 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | The_Waco_Kid | 35624 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
01-13-2013, 12:31 AM
|
#91
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,189
|
Twist words. we're the guns purchased legally?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 12:40 AM
|
#92
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
You're the one twisting words, Assup. Lanza was not legally in possession of the guns. It's the same as if he had stolen the guns. The gun may have been purchased legally, but not by him, nor for him.
Truth hurts, doesn't it, Assup.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 04:38 AM
|
#93
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Actually, an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States ... Something that wasnt part of the main document and wasnt added for a number of years after the main document was ratified.
|
Is that a statement that suggests the Amendments have less value or authority because they were not a part of the "original" document?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 07:25 AM
|
#94
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
You're the one twisting words, Assup. Lanza was not legally in possession of the guns. It's the same as if he had stolen the guns. The gun may have been purchased legally, but not by him, nor for him.
Truth hurts, doesn't it, Assup.
|
Maybe she left them to him in her will.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 08:01 AM
|
#95
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Maybe she left them to him in her will.
|
And maybe there is a law, also, in Connecticut that prohibits an heir from inheriting if the heir is responsible for the death of the person devising the items to the heir.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 08:35 AM
|
#96
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
You are what you eat.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 12:28 PM
|
#97
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
And maybe there is a law, also, in Connecticut that prohibits an heir from inheriting if the heir is responsible for the death of the person devising the items to the heir.
|
Humor escapes you doesn't it?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 12:48 PM
|
#98
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Humor escapes you doesn't it?
|
No. Not when something or someone is humorous.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 03:07 PM
|
#99
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
What I thought...You take yourself way too serious...
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
01-13-2013, 07:50 PM
|
#100
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer
What is your point?
That "Amendment" was part of the original Bill of Rights. The Constitution was adopted by the Constitutional Convention in September 17, 1787, but was not ratified until March 4, 1789.
Even at the time of the Constitutional Convention, the amendments in the Bill of Rights were already being kicked around by the Convention members. But due to the urgency of replacing the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution was rushed to the states for ratification with the understanding that the new Congress would immediately act on adding the Bill of Rights (2nd Amendment included).
So Congress first met on March 4, 1789 and, by September of that year, Congress sent the Bill of Rights (the first 10 Amendments) to the states for ratification. The Bill of Rights was ratified effective December 15, 1791. It got done in under 3 years. Considering how slow communications were back in those days and the difficulty in holding elections, that's pretty damn fast.
More importantly, though, from a legal point of view, there is no substantive difference between the original document and the amendments. They all have equal validity. So, the Constitution includes the amendments. They are not separate or lesser.
|
+1
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-14-2013, 06:18 PM
|
#101
|
Professional Tush Hog.
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,948
|
Why Washington. Go to Teheran or Kabul.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|