Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator didn’t score again!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

It must be nice to live in your world where everything is clear and definitive. It’s a good world, Old-goaT. It’s free of your Kool Aid induced delusions. Where good is good and evil is anyone who doesn't agree with you.

But the real world is not that way. It is a thousand shade of gray. Very few things are "right" and fewer still are completely "wrong". But your simple mind can't grasp that, can you? Most of what I post are OPINIONS. That's what a lot of people DO on a board like this. When I state my OPINION that your avatar reminds me of a dirty old man or a blow up doll, it is an OPINION. It remains, Old-goaT, your perversions don’t hold much meaning for others. When I point out that they are YOUR avatars, that is a fact. When I post that you have an increadibly filthy mouth (at least when you post here) that too is a FACT. See the difference?

Originally Posted by Old-T

Anyone give odds? His track record says ain't no way in hell he produces evidence. Instead he will:
--claim he did
--accuse you of hijacking the thread
--ignore the question.

I have to pull up a chair and some popcorn for this one! Just an FYI, Old-goaT, Assup likes to eat the popcorn he picks out of shit in public toilets – reckon he’ll share his with you, being he’s your asshole buddy and all!?! Did you look up the word “spectator”, Old-goaT. You are a POS ignorant fuck if you still think you’re a “spectator”, Old-goaT.

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

IB the spunk eater has won the "golden Lips" award.He can throw 'em and blow 'em before they can flip him and dick him.

There is no hope for you, Ekim the Inbred. You have such a lip-lock on Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator’s dick there's a pamphlet out describing how Slick Willie's weight loss is a secondary effect attributable to you're tremendous sucking power. BTW, Ekim the Inbred, you never answered the questions: can you now locate "North America" on a map, and do you now acknowledge Columbus interacted with Native Americans when he sailed to the New World?

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount=63

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...1&postcount=70

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount=73

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount=81

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...2&postcount=87

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Actually, if you're going to call someone a MURDERER, then you better be prepared to offer up evidence of a conviction, IBMeltingdown.

If you're going to call someone a THIEF, then you better be prepared to offer up evidence of a conviction, IBMeltingdown.

If you're going to call someone a RAPIST, then you better be prepared to offer up evidence of a conviction, IBMeltingdown.

If you're going to call someone a PERJURIST (a crime) and a SEXUAL PREDATOR (more criminal offenses), then you better be prepared to offer up evidence of a conviction, IBMeltingdown.

In this country, you are not a convicted ANYTHING until you're convicted.

Either show some evidence of a fucking conviction against President William J. Clinton or admit that you're just flapping your gums with no basis in fact. AGAIN! Either prove your claim or admit you're wrong AGAIN IBMeltingdown. This will be tonight's exercise.

Of course, you don't need to be convicted to be a DIPSHIT. You just have to wake up...

DIPSHIT!

Now STFU and go back to picking peanuts out of poop!

Just an FYI for everyone, Assup eats the popcorn he picks out of shit in public toilets.

Actually, and by way of your bullshit, straw-man analogies, Assup, there were four cops in LA who were acquitted – “not convicted” – of using excessive force on Rodney King – but that ruling didn’t make Rodney King's injuries disappear, you stupid fuck. Furthermore, Assup, what Slick Willie the Perjuring sexual Predator did meets this simple definition given by Merriam-Webster defines “perjury” thusly:

: the voluntary violation of an oath or vow either by swearing to what is untrue or by omission to do what has been promised under oath : false swearing. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perjury

(Evidently, as simple as that definition is, it's still over your head, Assup.)

Further, Federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright ruled that Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator’s testimony promised under oath was intentionally, falsely sworn:

"Simply put, the president's deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false, and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false...." [/B]

[24] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeach...f_Bill_Clinton

[Yssup Rider]

That may be so, IBStupid, but my point, made rather succinctly a number of times, is that Clinton was never convicted of perjury or any sexual crime.

You have been unable to prove that he was. Instead, you keep repeating the merriam-webster definition of perjury. I'm beginning to think you're incapable of logical thought.

You are wrong to call someone that which he isn't, FUCKFACE (see, totally within the parameters of this statement ... if you weren't a FUCKFACE, how could I call you one?)

If you aren't wrong. Prove it. Or just STFU!

END OF DISCUSSION... ANOTHER ASS WHOOPING FOR IBMeltingdown

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

That may be so, IBStupid, but my point, made rather succinctly a number of times, is that Clinton was never convicted of perjury or any sexual crime.

You have been unable to prove that he was. Instead, you keep repeating the merriam-webster definition of perjury. I'm beginning to think you're incapable of logical thought.

You are wrong to call someone that which he isn't, FUCKFACE (see, totally within the parameters of this statement ... if you weren't a FUCKFACE, how could I call you one?)

If you aren't wrong. Prove it. Or just STFU!

END OF DISCUSSION... ANOTHER ASS WHOOPING FOR IBMeltingdown

"U B Stupid" alright, Assup! You haven’t proved a damn thing. Judge Wright cited Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator for "willful failure" to obey her repeated orders to testify truthfully in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit": Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was found "guilty" of not telling the truth under oath! Further, Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator settled out of court with Paula Jones – which is very nearly the same thing as pleading nolo contendere to the sexual harassment suit!

Furthermore, Judge Wright wrote: Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator’s “deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false, and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false.”

Merriam-Webster defines “perjury” as “false swearing under oath” which was the basis for Judge Wright citing and punishing Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator: contempt of court for giving false, sworn testimony.

Judge Wright and Merriam-Webster have several things going for them that you don’t Assup. Among them are:

1) They have credibility, and they are widely respected as expert authorities in their respective fields. On the other hand, Assup, you have no credibility, and you are not respected even a little bit by others.
2) They are more trustworthy than you, Assup. You’re an untrustworthy and inveterate liar, Assup.
3) Their rulings and definitions are accepted by hundreds of millions; whereas, your opinion means jackshit to that same hundreds of millions, Assup.

[i'va biggen]

Ib hankering the esteemed pivot man,and winner of the golden lips award from the south Chicago circle jerk,and Bill Clinton envy club. Has once again bumped his fav rant.Let this thread die ...

[Yssup Rider]

Before you repeat yourself again, IBDrooling, try and understand the crux of this argument.

You are arguing that Bill Clinton was a criminal. I am arguing (and successfully) that he was never convicted of any crime. You are unable to produce evidence that he was. You are stating your opinion. I am stating fact.

PERIOD!


You have been served. AGAIN!

[Yssup Rider]

Congratulations, IB. You're the WINNER!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Before you repeat yourself again, IBDrooling, try and understand the crux of this argument.

You are arguing that Bill Clinton was a criminal. I am arguing (and successfully) that he was never convicted of any crime. You are unable to produce evidence that he was. You are stating your opinion. I am stating fact.

PERIOD!


You have been served. AGAIN!

Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was found "guilty" by Judge Wright when she cited Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator for contempt of court -- the basis for that ruling was Slick Willie delivered false testimony under oath: in violation of the law. Crimes are defined as acts or omissions forbidden by law that can be punished by imprisonment and/or fine. Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator violated the law, Judge Wright cited him and fined him. By definition, Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator is guilty of criminality.


As usual, Assup, you leave it to BigKoTex Anal Suppositories to take care of your "service".

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Congratulations, IB. You're the WINNER!

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Ib hankering the esteemed pivot man,and winner of the golden lips award from the south Chicago circle jerk,and Bill Clinton envy club. Has once again bumped his fav rant.Let this thread die ...

There is no hope for you, Ekim the Inbred. You have such a lip-lock on Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator’s dick there's a pamphlet out describing how Slick Willie's weight loss is a secondary effect attributable to you're tremendous sucking power. BTW, Ekim the Inbred, you never answered the questions: can you now locate "North America" on a map, and do you now acknowledge Columbus interacted with Native Americans when he sailed to the New World?

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount=63

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...1&postcount=70

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount=73

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount=81

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...2&postcount=87

[Yssup Rider]

WARNING, THE FOLLOWING QUOTE IS A REPEAT OF ANOTHER QUOTE WHICH WAS A REPEAT OF YET ANOTHER POST BY THE DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR AND WINNER OF THE 2012 GOLDEN LIPS AWARD! EXPECT ANOTHER REPEAT, OR MORE IN THE COMING HOURS!

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was found "guilty" by Judge Wright when she cited Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator for contempt of court.

You are wrong, again! A citation for contempt of court is NOT a CRIME against the constutitution, any state constitution or city charter. It is a discretionary power given to the judge over a trial.

He was CITED, not CHARGED. There was no arrest. There was no trial. There was no VERDICT. Without a VERDICT, you cannot be GUILTY. What part of this don't you understand ... other than ALL of it?

You continue to be stamping your little foot and having a tantrum in the candy aisle, DIPSHIT.

But again, congratulations on your Golden Lips Award!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

WARNING, THE FOLLOWING QUOTE IS A REPEAT OF ANOTHER QUOTE WHICH WAS A REPEAT OF YET ANOTHER POST BY THE DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR AND WINNER OF THE 2012 GOLDEN LIPS AWARD! EXPECT ANOTHER REPEAT, OR MORE IN THE COMING HOURS!

You are wrong, again! A citation for contempt of court is NOT a CRIME against the constutitution, any state constitution or city charter. It is a discretionary power given to the judge over a trial.

He was CITED, not CHARGED. There was no arrest. There was no trial. There was no VERDICT. Without a VERDICT, you cannot be GUILTY. What part of this don't you understand ... other than ALL of it?

You continue to be stamping your little foot and having a tantrum in the candy aisle, DIPSHIT.

But again, congratulations on your Golden Lips Award!

Wrong again, Assup. Judge Wright’s ruling wasn’t some arbitrary decision out of the blue! The contempt of court citation rendered by Judge Wright was predicated on her determining Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was guilty of “giving false testimony under oath”. “Giving false testimony under oath” is a violation of the law; as such, it served as the basis for Judge Wright's ruling. Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator submitted to her ruling. Whereas he acknowledged his guilt when he chose not to appeal her ruling, you are now ignorantly denying that guilt in the face of the judge's extant ruling, Assup.

[Yssup Rider]

Again you miss the point fool. It WAS an arbitrary decision by the judge. That's what CONTEMPT OF COURT IS, you blithering idiot! Maybe not out of the blue, but Clinton was NOT CHARGED, TRIED or CONVICTED OF PERJURY OR RAPE. Show me the FUCKING booking slip, asshole, or STFU!

That's like you admitting you suck cock. Which you really should do. Have you been charged with cocksucking? You have been cited, though. As the winner of the GOLDEN LIPS AWARD!

[CuteOldGuy]

Are you saying Slick Willie told the truth, Assup?

[Yssup Rider]

Is that what I wrote, Whiny?

[CuteOldGuy]

Just answer the question. Do you think Clinton told the truth. A simple yes or no will do.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Again you miss the point fool. It WAS an arbitrary decision by the judge. That's what CONTEMPT OF COURT IS, you blithering idiot! Maybe not out of the blue, but Clinton was NOT CHARGED, TRIED or CONVICTED OF PERJURY OR RAPE. Show me the FUCKING booking slip, asshole, or STFU!

That's like you admitting you suck cock. Which you really should do. Have you been charged with cocksucking? You have been cited, though. As the winner of the GOLDEN LIPS AWARD!

Wrong again, Assup. Judge Wright’s ruling wasn’t an arbitrary decision out of the blue! Judge Wright's ruling came after Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's video taped, public admission that he had not told the truth while under oath, jackass! Subsequently, the contempt of court citation rendered by Judge Wright was predicated on her determining Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was guilty -- by his own admission -- of “giving false testimony under oath”. “Giving false testimony under oath” is a violation of the law; as such, it served as the basis for Judge Wright's ruling. Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator submitted to her ruling. Whereas he acknowledged his guilt when he chose not to appeal her ruling, you are now ignorantly denying that guilt in the face of the judge's extant ruling, Assup.