No Bibles Allowed

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by Little Stevie

You ASSUME the rule is LAW and then scold TTH for a typo? You really are the board's biggest No-Life Loser, COF!

And acpWipe thinks everything he gets in an email is true.

Besides all that, when did Obama start writing all the U.S. Navy's regulations?


FUCKING WINGNUT MORONS

Why can't it be true ya militant piece of crap. Drips like you think Obama has a Gold lining surrounding him. Besides he has interjected a lot of bullshit in every facet of government including the millitary.

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by waverunner234

I didn't say I don't believe in God. I just don't believe in those fairy tales in the bible.
Those are hand written, a 1000 times over and over again. How can anyone believe in that?

I'd like to see Jesus in court, and under oath tell us how he made wine out of water.
Christ I would start a liquor store tomorrow if I could do that.

Well some people do believe in God and read the Bible. If you have a problem with any of that then you might want to take your own advice.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by acp5762

NO BIBLES ALLOWED -
- KING OBAMA EDICT (Unbelievable)~

To: I'm sorry, but for those of you who like Obama, this is just going way toooooo
far!!!!!!!


Who in America , or their right mind, would vote for Obama after
they read this?

Obama must really want to be a one term president! The soldiers who
wake up inWalter Reed Medical Center are in Maryland , not communist China . But,under
the Navy's new rules, they may not know the difference!

After months of peeling away the military's core values, Obama's army is on the
move. And this time, it has a high-value target: the Bible.

In a memo obtained by FRC, Navy officials have announced that "no religious items (including
Bibles, reading material, and/or artifacts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit." The new orders are buried in a
four-page document about patient care, which an Army officer forwarded to us in disbelief!
Effective immediately, families, friends, and even pastors will have to check their beliefs at the door to visit one of the largest
military hospitals in the United States Last night, after we circulated the memo to leaders on the Hill, an outraged Rep. Steve King
(R-Iowa)to to the House floor and blasted the obama policy!

"Mr. Speaker, these military men and women who are recovering at Walter Reed and Bethesda have given their all
for America ! They've defended and taken an oath to the Constitution, and here they are. The people who
come to visit them can't bring a religious artifact? They can't bring a Bible? ... A priest can't walk in with the Eucharist and offer communion to a patient who might be on their deathbed because it's prohibited in this memo from the Department of the Navy?"

This is Obama's military, where homosexuality is celebrated and Christianity is censored; where witches are financed and crosses are scorned; where bestiality is embracedand Bibles are banned; where same-sex "weddings" are
encouraged but international charity is not! After three years of ideological warfare, the Obama administration's intent is
clear: to disarm the military of its biggest weapon…..FAITH. Regardless of Obama's agenda, there is absolutely nothing in the Constitution that empowers the government to stop family members from giving Bibles or crosses to their loved ones! And
from a PR standpoint, I'm not sure the best way to boost approval ratings is by denying comfort to wounded warriors!Unfortunately
for our troops, who have endured so much turmoil under the Obama administration, this is another blow!
Hopefully, with the help of Congressman King and others, it's only a temporary one.
Even

liberal Snopes says it’s true: http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/walterreed.asp

So you already knew it was bullshit when you posted it. If you aren't lying, your sister is at least as big of piece shit as you.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I can think of many reasons to not vote for Romney, but I can't think of ONE SINGLE REASON to vote for Obama. This is outrageous.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

C'mon, libs. Defend your man on this one. You're willing to let Christians die in your wars, why can't they have a Bible during their recovery?

As with the lack of validity of many of your posts, there is no need to defend him. But you need to defend yourself....don't worry, we know you don't admit it when you’re wrong.
And your slogans aside, an American doesn't disown his country at the drop of a hat or to illustrate a point.

Originally Posted by acp5762

I don't think they can COG. My sister sent me that through my email. She's rather knowledgeable about political issues much more than I am. We were born Catholic, I know that if I was in a hospital recovering from a war injury she would be inclined to bring or send me religious material of our Catholic faith to console and inspire me during my recovery. If she was prevented from doing so because of a ridiculous law in place it would be very unsettling to her. Iam sure thats why she sent it. I thought it would be appropiate to post it here.

A quick stop to throw his sister under the bus and then it's off to pretend to be outraged.

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Wrong again Officer Dipshit !

And what kind of collection of assholes would this be without a true "A" lister asshole weighing in on something he doesn't have a clue about.

Originally Posted by acp5762

I didn't write this thing dude. I only posted it. Don't blame it on Georgie Porgy Bush either. Through out history injured soldiers have never been restricted from recieving religious material from family, priest or pastors, but now on Obama's watch they are. I would say thats impeding upon their religious freedoms.

You would watch America be dishonored for your political beliefs.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

TTH, the rule was "reminded"? Had they forgotten?

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Now, honestly, Wave. How can you watch that and not believe in god? That is a heavenly body if I've ever seen one!

The rest of your posts are an attempt to cover for your earlier douche-baggery. How do we know? Beside you talking/typing? Your outrage. You must have misplaced it.

Originally Posted by acp5762

Why can't it be true ya militant piece of crap. Drips like you think Obama has a Gold lining surrounding him. Besides he has interjected a lot of bullshit in every facet of government including the millitary.

Why can't it be true? No one said it can't be. It isn't so why play "what if?"
If you want to pretend, pretend you have some honor left and STFU to prove it.
Good post. I can't wait for your next gem.

[acp5762]

You're a hideous piece of home grown shit Munchbutt. Your political beliefs are based on nothing. If your going to disagree with someone you can still do it without being a lowlife classless little cunt. Yeah I believe this article was true now cause assholes like you would uphold it. Oh and you don't have to drag someones family into your fucked up replies either goes to show what a fucking jerk you really are.

[Annef]

"where witches are financed and crosses are scorned; where bestiality is embracedand Bibles are banned." That's awesome. I want that on a teeshirt. Ironically worn, of course.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by Annef

"where witches are financed and crosses are scorned; where bestiality is embracedand Bibles are banned." That's awesome. I want that on a teeshirt. Ironically worn, of course.

Ironed on locally?

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by acp5762

You're a hideous piece of home grown shit Munchbutt. Your political beliefs are based on nothing. If your going to disagree with someone you can still do it without being a lowlife classless little cunt. Yeah I believe this article was true now cause assholes like you would uphold it. Oh and you don't have to drag someones family into your fucked up replies either goes to show what a fucking jerk you really are.

First off, suck my dick.
Second, do it again but this time like you did in that movie. You remember? That dog?

OK. You brought your sister up. You praised her political acumen. You ducked all responsibility for your posting. You said, "I didn't write this thing dude. I only posted it." and "My sister sent me that through my email. She's rather knowledgeable about political issues much more than I am."

So your sister sent you an email she knew was wrong. You knowingly posted the same lie because for some reason you thought it was “appropiate” to do so. Lying is always “appropiate”, isn’t it?
Now you proclaim this known lie to be true. Why? Why are you willing to believe some dastardly and untrue deed supposedly done by the leader of our country?
Because of something I did. Your computer-like logic in action.

Because I upheld “it”. Upheld what? I cut you and your (and your sister’s) lie down without the slightest regard for your feelings (or your sister’s). It had to be done and I have to admit I enjoyed it.
Not because you are a lying, cocksucking, piece of whale shit. That’s a given by your own words. Not because someone like you only advances by trying to pull someone down to your level. That’s obvious. Because you give shitty head? Partially.
No, mostly because you have none of the qualities of the group you appear to claim membership to and you have every possible flaw.
You are the flattest spot on the bell curve.

And oh yeah; because I felt like it you little prick.

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

First off, suck my dick.
Second, do it again but this time like you did in that movie. You remember? That dog?

OK. You brought your sister up. You praised her political acumen. You ducked all responsibility for your posting. You said, "I didn't write this thing dude. I only posted it." and "My sister sent me that through my email. She's rather knowledgeable about political issues much more than I am."

So your sister sent you an email she knew was wrong. You knowingly posted the same lie because for some reason you thought it was “appropiate” to do so. Lying is always “appropiate”, isn’t it?
Now you proclaim this known lie to be true. Why? Why are you willing to believe some dastardly and untrue deed supposedly done by the leader of our country?
Because of something I did. Your computer-like logic in action.

Because I upheld “it”. Upheld what? I cut you and your (and your sister’s) lie down without the slightest regard for your feelings (or your sister’s). It had to be done and I have to admit I enjoyed it.
Not because you are a lying, cocksucking, piece of whale shit. That’s a given by your own words. Not because someone like you only advances by trying to pull someone down to your level. That’s obvious. Because you give shitty head? Partially.
No, mostly because you have none of the qualities of the group you appear to claim membership to and you have every possible flaw.
You are the flattest spot on the bell curve.

And oh yeah; because I felt like it you little prick.

All I can say to you is eat shit and die motherfucker. I am through with you.

[timpage]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I can think of many reasons to not vote for Romney, but I can't think of ONE SINGLE REASON to vote for Obama. This is outrageous.

C'mon, libs. Defend your man on this one. You're willing to let Christians die in your wars, why can't they have a Bible during their recovery?

Defend yourself on this one moron. Completely wrong as usual.

What a surprise, the regulation was put in place to keep the bible-thumping fanatics that are such a big part of he GOP base from harassing the wounded and their families while the wounded are recuperating in military medical facilities.

[waverunner234]

What a bunch of idiots here!

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by timpage

Defend yourself on this one moron. Completely wrong as usual.

What a surprise, the regulation was put in place to keep the bible-thumping fanatics that are such a big part of he GOP base from harassing the wounded and their families while the wounded are recuperating in military medical facilities.

The rule was rescinded (not reminded), I see that. And I would support a rule that forbade unsolicited proselytizing. The rule was far too broad, and it is a good thing it was rescinded.

That doesn't excuse AssMunchers attack on ACP. It was classless, but typical of AssMuncher.

I was partially wrong, not completely wrong. So I partially apologize.

[Little Stevie]

COF, you are ALWAYS wrong!

TTH made a typo when he wanted to use the word "remanded". He is not a Dumb Shit like you who tries to guess at what he meant. Go look up the word "remanded" and then try to tell me TTH meant to type "rescinded".

Munch's obliteration of acpwipe's nonsense was superlative and acpwipe deserved every bit of it!

Hell, you Bible-thumping asswipes tried to take over the Texas schoolbook purchasing and editing and even wanted the books edited to add that Noah put DINOSAURS on the ark! Your partisan asses tried also to edit the book to refer to President Obama as President Barack Hussein Obama. Partisan creationist hacks!

You are all a bunch of stupid troglodytes.

[CuteOldGuy]

Uh, Stevie, the article says the rule was "rescinded". I know what remanded means. I suggest you look it up.

And I assure you, I have NEVER tried to take over Texas schoolbook purchasing. I promise!

What do you have against a schoolbook using the name of a President? Odd. Still, I was not asked, nor did I give any input into the decision.

Stevie, lay off the caffeine. You're stupider tonight than you have been in a long time.