Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again
... I don't think the plan was to damage it.
Russia just wanted to get control of it.
### Salty
|
I think their objective could had gone either way.
"We want to control the power station, so we will do so by force. Give us this critical objective peacefully!"
"We wanted to control the power station, but they didn't let us, so we shelled it. The fact that it overloaded and causes a disaster many times greater than Chernobyl wasn't our fault! They should had surrendered"
Either way, Putler is trying to start a nuclear war in the most roundabout way imaginable.
We need Russia to do like Japan did at Pearl Harbor. Yes, that is tragic, but then there would be no quarrel with NATO entering the war. But then again, if NATO did rightfully enact article 5, who isn't to say he will go nuclear in retaliation...
Either way, unless someone does the needful with a slug into his head, everything is risky.