*sigh* This is a strawman argument. There are a lot of options other than the extremes of: (a) a bare-bones review with minimal information and (b) a crude, chest-beating review such as you describe. If those were the only choices, a lot of ladies would prefer (a). But those are not the only choices.
The readers are deciding not just "should I see her" but also "should I see her
instead of, or before seeing, another lady." When a client has limited time and budget, he may be looking for some way to compare ladies he's considering and prioritize. If the review consists of only: (A) is she LE/scam/rip-off or not; and (B) "Yes/No" -- that's not going to distinguish her very much.
Most reviews for
most ladies will be "she's legit" + "Yes." Even your level of enthusiasm doesn't help much, since WALDT. Does a review like that encourage a prospective client to see her rather than 100 other ladies with similar reviews? It doesn't seem like this type of review would do much other than help weed out the ladies who can't even get "she's legit" + "yes" reviews. (It's more like the reverse of a lady asking to see that a prospective client has a couple of OKs on P411.) And that's a prettly low percentage, isn't it?
On the other hand, a review consisting of "she's legit" and "yes" may work very well for a client who narrows the choices down and decides who he wants to see on some basis other than reviews, and then checks the reviews only as a final step to make sure he's not about to make a horrible mistake. There are certainly clients like that, and some of them may not even read reviews at all. There are some ladies who may deliberately want to target that audience. But most ladies have to cast their net a bit wider.
Most of the ladies I've discussed reviews with say that it's more helpful to have a review that's more detailed than just "she's legit" and "yes, I recommend." Note that I do not use "detailed" as a euphemism for "graphic" or "crude." You can write a review that gives a lot of information about a lady, that may help distinguish her from her competitors, without a graphic blow-by-blow discussion. You can give a sense of her personality, her style, her appearance, how she took care of the business aspects, etc., etc. Paint a (non-graphic) picture with words.
And some ladies have even indicated that they like a review (because it's good for business) that makes the reader eager to see her, but without going to the extremes you describe. Or as one lady put it: "steamy and informative, but not so raunchy that I feel the need to blush."
Personally, I don't care how you or anyone else writes reviews. I'm not looking for new ladyfriends these days so I likely wouldn't
read reviews regardless of style. Even if I did, you can still write however you please. If I don't find your reviews informative, I just won't read them. If I
write one, very rare these days, hell, if the lady only wants a "she's legit" and "Yes" review, I guess I'd be willing to write one that way -- but more likely just wouldn't write one at all.
For many ladies, it's a matter of balance. Not so graphic or crude that it embarasses or belittles her. Not so bland that it makes her feel good but doesn't help her business by attracting other clients. In my opinion, as long as the reviewer is not omitting negative information that clients should know about, a lady should be able to choose the balance she prefers between invasion of privacy and business development. She may be sacrificing some business because she's uncomfortable with reviews, but if that's her choice, it's her right.
[Note: If any lady I've reviewed would like to explain to me why my review made her uncomfortable, or would like to know what the review said, feel free to email.
]
Reviews ?
My Bio Page - Kansas City Metro
My Bio Page - Arkansas
