You can't please everyone...

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

Then my comments don't pertain to you now do they?

Originally Posted by canyonman

SL, I was saying her photos had been discussed in the open forums long before this thread even exsisted...

That's why I posted the above comment.

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by JJ

This seems to be an issue just between the two of you. Would you please take this off the boards and figure it out on your own.

The topic of this discussion is SweetCara's response to a No review.

Let's not continue to argue who outed the ROS information that was not in the ROS brackets of her review.

It has already been established that the information was outside of the brackets for most of last night. There is no need to continue to argue who is right or wrong on this matter.

I am also not going to become involved in this argument and will start issuing warnings and points if it this thread continues to be derailed.

JJ Canyon is a fan, no big deal. I am currently looking and have reviewed the ROS in the review and also items the OP has in her original post revealing ROS Intel. If the San Antonio MODS think its OK then we will just move on. I think by not editing the thread you (the Mods) are setting a standard for revealing ROS Intel. I have certainly hit the RTM button advising the MODS. I have done this because accident or no accident I would not want my ROS published in an open forum. This thread accomplishes two things. One the OP can't post in the review so she started this thread. This I understand. But leaving the ROS just makes no sense to me what so ever.

As a matter of staying on topic... the OP should request anything she listed that was ROS she saw by accident edited as it is against the rules / guidelines to do so. That would be the right thing to do.

I've been wrong before and if I am I'm certainly not beyond saying so or apologizing.

[Guest081519]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

JJ Canyon is a fan, no big deal. I am currently looking and have reviewed the ROS in the review and also items the OP has in her original post revealing ROS Intel. If the San Antonio MODS think its OK then we will just move on. I think by not editing the thread you (the Mods) are setting a standard for revealing ROS Intel. I have certainly hit the RTM button advising the MODS. I have done this because accident or no accident I would not want my ROS published in an open forum. This thread accomplishes two things. One the OP can't post in the review so she started this thread. This I understand. But leaving the ROS just makes no sense to me what so ever.

As a matter of staying on topic... the OP should request anything she listed that was ROS she saw by accident edited as it is against the rules / guidelines to do so. That would be the right thing to do.

I've been wrong before and if I am I'm certainly not beyond saying so or apologizing.

SL,

If you wish to start a new thread to discuss this, you are more than welcome to. In the meantime, and if you are going to participate in this discussion, please stay on topic.

[pyramider]

Originally Posted by JJ

The topic of this discussion is SweetCara's response to a No review.

A no review can be cured thru the taint. Proper tainted activities will result in only Yes reviews.

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by JJ

SL,

If you wish to start a new thread to discuss this, you are more than welcome to. In the meantime, and if you are going to participate in this discussion, please stay on topic.

No Problem. Thank You JJ

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=955464