Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Ya think? She tried to get one over on the American public. This is the thing - they - the dems - don't seem to get it---the American public is not stupid.
Actually the report suggests that Warren is between 1/64th and 1/1024th Native American. Warren at no time specified who in her family tree might be Native American, just that in family discussions on her background it was stated that there was ancestry with Native American blood.
Thank you for posting that video and verifying what I said. Warren would not commit to being 1/16th, 1/32nd, or 1/64th Native American, just that she had Native American blood in her DNA, which the test she took proved, just as the test I took proved my family ancestry to have English, Eastern European, and German blood in my DNA.
You're crawfishing. In the video, Warren states that her mother was part Cherokee. Whether her mother is "full blooded" or not makes no difference. She infers that her mother was enough that there was some stigma and consequence attached to it. She also names the Delaware tribe.
We don’t fully know how important Warren’s claims were in her career. There is, however, much evidence that her self-driven minority claims in the 1990s were helpful. Warren, who once maintained her family had “high cheekbones like all of the Indians do,” was listed as a “minority faculty member” by The University of Pennsylvania. She had the school switch her designation from white to Native American. Warren self-identified as a “minority” in the legal directory, and Harvard Law School preposterously listed her as one of the “women of color” the school had hired. On job applications, Warren was very specific in claiming that she had Cherokee and Delaware Indian ancestry.
The video only proves how wrong you are. You're welcome.
You're crawfishing. In the video, Warren states that her mother was part Cherokee. Whether her mother is "full blooded" or not makes no difference. She infers that her mother was enough that there was some stigma and consequence attached to it. She also names the Delaware tribe.
We don’t fully know how important Warren’s claims were in her career. There is, however, much evidence that her self-driven minority claims in the 1990s were helpful. Warren, who once maintained her family had “high cheekbones like all of the Indians do,” was listed as a “minority faculty member” by The University of Pennsylvania. She had the school switch her designation from white to Native American. Warren self-identified as a “minority” in the legal directory, and Harvard Law School preposterously listed her as one of the “women of color” the school had hired. On job applications, Warren was very specific in claiming that she had Cherokee and Delaware Indian ancestry.
The video only proves how wrong you are. You're welcome.
Her DNA test results are useless. they came from dna of south american indians. They weren't able to get the DNA of native americans tribe in the USA because many of the tribal leaders told their people to not to get dna tested as they would get abused and ripped off.
Her DNA test results are useless. they came from dna of Mexican and south american indians. They weren't able to get the DNA of native americans tribe in the USA because many of the tribal leaders told their people to not to get dna tested as they would get abused and ripped off.
Regarding Fauxcahontas' .01% claim to Cherokee ancestry. I took the Ancestry-DNA test several years ago and the readout said I was predominantly British Isle's European, but there were four <2% "trace percentages", e.g. <2% Ashkenazi Jew & <1% Eastern European. In each of those four instances, Ancestry-DNA made this annotation:
Quote:
"A trace percentage indicates a very small amount of shared DNA in common with the corresponding population. In some cases this minor percentage could be attributed to background noise."
Hence, Fauxcahontas' .01% claim to Cherokee is 1.98% less than what Ancestry-DNA attributes as sometimes being "background noise" -- a "false or misleading reading".
