Quote:
Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter
No...the key word was statistically.
I'm not trying to spin anything. I'm trying to report the facts so the op and bitter readers like you can understand them. The question was by race and the answer is by race...one race compared to other races.
Statistics are applied mathematics concerned with collecting, organizing, and interpreting data and determining the likelihood and probability of events occurring based on known quantitative data. It is *all about* normalizing and rates.
But you/we can go ahead and report the numbers in aggregate:.....extrapolated, it becomes even more embarrassing for the negros.
So non-hispanic whites had less than half of the babies to unwed mothers. But non-hispanic whites have over 60 percent of the population. Non-hispanic white barely outnumbered non-hispanic black who are at something like 13% of the population.
That is despicable.
Now......do this:
1. normalize these very numbers and figure out how many negro baby daddies there would be if the non-hispanic black woman population equaled that of non-hispanic white woman.
2. recalculate the percentage of unwed non-hispanic white baby mamas and unwed non-hispanic black baby mamas assuming that abortion was forbidden and those babies weren't murdered before they counted as births.
Now merge the two situations above and you will deduce that if the population of non-hispanic black woman was as high as that of non-hispanic white woman, America would be.....
============================== ======
rayguy is a great example as to why the Negro race cannot produce a solution to their problem.....they can't even begin to believe and understand that there is one (a problem).
|
^ Your general surface knowledge of things is ok I guess but need to get you to start thinking beyond the surface. I do give you Kudos for effort though.
Now if I may and knowing the kinda N word I am ;-) if I merge the two situations above as you say and make my deductions in terms of "normalizing and recalculating" here's what I come up with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
As power corrupts absolutely so does poverty beget poverty absolutely. It's true there's a numbers problem in the black community across multiple fronts but it's no secret that it's virtually rooted in the justice, economic, education, and social disparities we historically live under.
|
So going by your example to normalize then we logically assume we're normalizing across all disparate areas (
justice, economic, education, and social ) since 1.) there's inter-dependencies that cannot be decoupled and 2.) yall've had an ~250+ year head start on the Negro. So in layman's terms if you normalize as you say then the needle has to be moved across the board if your example is going to have any merit. That essentially means we're not merely looking at census data to make wild general assumptions but actually taking into account all things being equal across the areas I mentioned above.
Not trying to put salt in da game; just looking out for ya since you missed quite a bit of analysis while bashing the negro's inability to recognize and then provide solutions.
Again Kudos to ya; it was well typed up and read well but it was still a big:
Swing and a Miss
My Bio Page - Texas - Houston
![](http://eccie.net/<iframe src="//giphy.com/embed/4S3viviNIBTb2" width="480" height="345" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/in-living-color-4S3viviNIBTb2">via GIPHY</a></p>)
One should only drop a mic if they've unequivocally proven a point. I don't expect you to realize this but just between us ;-) you obviously haven't. Instead you fellas are getting all excited with various links to different data sets or opinions while offering nothing substantive. Did you just link a Huffpost article on comments the deranged Lepage made as some "Proof"? hahahaha you folks amuse me.
My Bio Page - Texas - Houston
or a failed attempt? I'm guessing the latter. 
