Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Whirlaway · 05-22-2015, 10:13 AM

Juanita Broaddrick has Clinton of rape.

You are a dumb fuck and a liar.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanm

Yes, I am definitely the sick one. I am the one who "reveres" a rapist while at the same time chastising a comedian for making a rape joke. I need help.

No one ever brought up rape charges against Clinton, except the media claims made by Elizabeth Gracen, who later recanted her story and apologized. So unless you're talking about some unknown incident where slick Willy forced you to bend over the resolute desk, keep your "beliefs" to your self.

shanm · 05-22-2015, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Juanita Broaddrick has accused Clinton of raping her.

You are a dumb fuck and a liar.

You have some real balls calling me a dumb fuck.

A person who accuses someone of rape, yet doesn't even remember the exact date! Plus has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to prove it with...yeah, I wouldn't really call that rape.

According to Jack Nelson, Washington bureau chief of the Los Angeles Times, many journalists were skeptical: "This is a story that's been knocked down and discredited so many times, I was shocked to see it in the [Wall Street] Journal today.... [E]veryone's taken a slice of it, and after looking at it, everyone's knocked it down. The woman has changed her story about whether it happened. It just wasn't credible."

We all know that "not credible" is your MO, so please carry on.

Like I said, you have some balls calling me, or anyone, a "dumb fuck".

Yssup Rider · 05-22-2015, 10:24 AM

Whir-LIE-turd, you need to provide a link to the rape charges against President Clinton, or else you're lying yet again!

Besides, what the FUCK does any of this have to do with David Letterman's retirement and your obvious feelings of loss and betrayal as a result of the late night entertainment TV host's departure?

Do you have this much trouble staying on topic when you're ordering at Mickey D's?

Whirlaway · 05-22-2015, 10:26 AM

You are one sick fuck, defending a sexual predator like Clinton.

You made the claim "NO ONE" has brought up rape claims against Clinton. You are a dumb fuck for making that claim and a sick soul for defending a molester like Clinton.

At least I admit that both Cosby and Clinton are despicable sick fucks. But you defend the actions of a guy you agree with politically.

WombRaider · 05-22-2015, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Wrong.

There isn't a comedian from my younger days I don’t still revere, including the left-wing George Carlin. Cosby, Seinfeld, Robin Williams, Dennis Miller, Pryor, the first five years of “Saturday Night Live” — still love all of it.

Early Letterman was funny; but like I said, he turned mean, caustic and boring.

When he lost the Carson seat and couldn't beat Leno in ratings. Letterman's shtick devolved to cheap mean laughs - Chris Christie’s weight; Rush Limbaugh’s personal life; everything Bill O’Reilly; Bush, Cheney, Palin, and the last straw, a statutory rape joke about Palin’s 15 year-old daughter. And let's not forget Letterman's over the top anti gun rants.

I didn't leave Letterman, he left me.

Were you even around in the early 1980s when Letterman first came to view?

Like I posted. You are part of Letterman's target audience: urban, cynical, elite, Blue State jerks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Never said anything remotely close to this. Typical Shamwow, just makes shit up.

Here is actually what I said about Letterman......

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Interesting and very telling just how sick Shamwow is....he says Letterman making a joke about Bristol Palin being raped is ok because it turned out Letterman was "mistaken" and Palin wasn't actually raped; Letterman apologized for being wrong so all is okey dokey.

That is one sick line of thinking.

Actually, you said exactly that, you lying, degenerate titlicker. You said you revered Cosby. Don't try and weasel out of it now.

He also never said that making a rape joke was ok. But there's an ocean of difference between making a rape joke and actually raping up to 40 women. You're the sick fucking bastard.

WombRaider · 05-22-2015, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You are one sick fuck, defending a sexual predator like Clinton.

No one is defending him, fuckstick, but if you're going to say the guy raped someone, you need to come with something better than this bullshit you're coming with. Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true, no matter how bad you want it to be.

Whirlaway · 05-22-2015, 10:32 AM

You are too stupid to discern the difference between revering someone's on stage talents but detesting their personal behavior.

Cosby was a comical genius just as Bill Clinton was a political genius; I admire their respective skills, but both are despicable individuals in their private lives.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Actually, you said exactly that, you lying, degenerate titlicker. You said you revered Cosby. Don't try and weasel out of it now.

He also never said that making a rape joke was ok. But there's an ocean of difference between making a rape joke and actually raping up to 40 women. You're the sick fucking bastard.

WombRaider · 05-22-2015, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You are too stupid to discern the difference between revering someone's on stage talents but despising their personal behavior.

Cosby was a comical genius just as Bill Clinton was a political genius; I admire their respective skills, but both are despicable individuals in their private lives.

Yeah, you said that before too. It was bullshit then, it's bullshit now. You are too stupid to understand that we see through you, guppy.

Whirlaway · 05-22-2015, 10:38 AM

You refuse to face the facts..........either you are too dense to realize it or too arrogant to admit it.

By "we" you mean you and a the 3 other losers who can be counted on to defend liberal stupid-think in this forum?

Quote:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Yeah, you said that before too. It was bullshit then, it's bullshit now. You are too stupid to understand that we see through you, guppy.

shanm · 05-22-2015, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You refuse to face the facts..........either you are too dense to realize it or too arrogant to admit it.

By "we" you mean you and a the 3 other losers who can be counted on to defend liberal stupid-think in this forum?

No, by "we", we mean us plus the absence of your usual butt munchers on your stupid, asinine, pointless threads. Even they won't touch this one.

You weaseled out of a plain-as-day $100 bet, I don't think it surprises anyone that you are trying to weasel your way out of this one.

LexusLover · 05-22-2015, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You refuse to face the facts..........

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv.../legaldocs.htm

Highlights:
• Depositions: Lewinsky | Jordan | Blumenthal
• Transcripts from Senate Trial
• House Reply to White House Trial Memo, Filed Jan. 14
• White House Trial Memo, Filed Jan. 13
• House Trial Memo, Filed Jan. 11
• Bipartisan Impeachment Trial Procedures
• Approved Articles of Impeachment
• Impeachment Hearings Transcripts
• White House Answers to Committee's 81 Questions
• Starr's Report to Congress
• Starr's Evidence, Including Clinton and Lewinsky Testimony
• Tripp Tape Transcripts
• President Clinton's Jan. 17 Deposition in Jones Case
• The Lewinsky Affidavit

"The Great Right Wing Conspiracy"!

shanm · 05-22-2015, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanm

No, by "we", we mean us plus the absence of your usual butt munchers on your stupid, asinine, pointless threads. Even they won't touch this one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv.../legaldocs.htm

Highlights:

I mention butt-munchers and look who showed up!

Whirlaway · 05-22-2015, 11:06 AM

Again, you show your stupidity. Do you ever get your facts right?

It wasn't a bet. It was a reward offered for proof. No one provided proof. Even the Washington Post Fact Checker wouldn't accept your proof.

Why should I pay a reward for information that WAPO wouldn't accept?

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanm

No, by "we", we mean us plus the absence of your usual butt munchers on your stupid, asinine, pointless threads. Even they won't touch this one.

You weaseled out of a plain-as-day $100 bet, I don't think it surprises anyone that you are trying to weasel your way out of this one.

WombRaider · 05-22-2015, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanm

I mention butt-munchers and look who showed up!

Yep. Good old LL the bitch face idiot boy.

WombRaider · 05-22-2015, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Again, you show your stupidity. Do you ever get your facts right?

It wasn't a bet. It was a reward offered for proof. No one provided proof. Even the Washington Post Fact Checker wouldn't accept your proof.

Why should I pay a reward for information that WAPO wouldn't accept?

A reward offered for proof? That sounds like Clinton and what is is.

It was a bet, you cocktard.

The Fatwa was issued. Your refusal to accept that illustrates your weasel nature.