Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
645 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
389 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
273 |
George Spelvin |
261 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70672 | biomed1 | 62316 | Yssup Rider | 60189 | gman44 | 53216 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48375 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41215 | CryptKicker | 37176 | Mokoa | 36491 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | The_Waco_Kid | 35624 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
10-23-2012, 10:30 PM
|
#31
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Perhaps if certain politicians didn't aggrandize themselves at other's expense.
.
|
One is a politician , the other was a Navy Seal.
So you say there is no difference?
I think that was all Ansley was pointing out.
These Seals are lowering themselves in the mudslinging of politics.
Is that what they were trained for?
Were they trained to take credit? To be slapped on the back by the public? Is that this former Seal's new mission?
It appears so to some, me included.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 10:33 PM
|
#32
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
One is a politician , the other was a Navy Seal.
So you say there is no difference?
I think that was all Ansley was pointing out.
These Seals are lowering themselves in the mudslinging of politics.
Is that what they were trained for?
Were they trained to take credit? To be slapped on the back by the public? Is that this former Seal's new mission?
It appears so to some, me included.
|
The Commander in Chief led the procession into the proverbial mud pit. The SEALs had a right to respond.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 10:38 PM
|
#33
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,189
|
I suppose you'd rather we had things the way they were four years ago.
Dipshit.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 10:39 PM
|
#34
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
More dribbling bullshit-blather from the pile of bullshit AKA Assup!
|
.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 10:42 PM
|
#35
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
The Commander in Chief led the procession into the proverbial mud pit. The SEALs had a right to respond.
|
Former Seal. The Seals did not respond, one former Seal wrote a book !
Then you agree he went into a mud pit. Good, we are making progress.
Politics is a mud pit and now the former Seal is dumb enough to go into the mud pit on his own accord. For monetary gain. We have already had this discussion from here.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 10:51 PM
|
#36
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Did you learn that on Wikipedia, WDF?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 10:54 PM
|
#37
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
Former Seal. The Seals did not respond, one former Seal wrote a book !
Then you agree he went into a mud pit. Good, we are making progress.
Politics is a mud pit and now the former Seal is dumb enough to go into the mud pit on his own accord. For monetary gain. We have already had this discussion from here.
|
They felt maligned by Odumbo's posturing and using their prowess and accomplishments for his political aggrandizement. Had Odumbo not gone on his "apology tour" and denigrated their service and their accomplishments during the Bush years, Odumbo may have fared better in their eyes. Had Odumbo liberally used the pronouns "they" and "we" instead of repeatedly saying "I", he would have fared better in their eyes.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 11:02 PM
|
#38
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,189
|
Was it you that Bitchita Whineman called one of the most intelligent posters on ECCIE?
NOPE!
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 11:07 PM
|
#39
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Well, Assup, first of all, you are obviously no judge of intelligence. And I have never cut and pasted from Wikipedia and tried to pass it off as my own thoughts to make myself sound smarter than I really am. But I'm sure you're impressed by that.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 11:09 PM
|
#40
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 499
Join Date: Apr 3, 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,276
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
They felt maligned by Odumbo's posturing and using their prowess and accomplishments for his political aggrandizement. Had Odumbo not gone on his "apology tour" and denigrated their service and their accomplishments during the Bush years, Odumbo may have fared better in their eyes. Had Odumbo liberally used the pronouns "they" and "we" instead of repeatedly saying "I", he would have fared better in their eyes.
|
I think that President Obama handled it all wrong. I'm sure the lack the words "they and "we" chapped their butts to no end. Maybe I am a bit old school, because of the influences that I have had, but I don't think military should go around disrespecting a President.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 11:33 PM
|
#41
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Did you learn that on Wikipedia, WDF?
![Lmfao](https://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilies/modern/lmfao.gif)
|
No but I got the quoted material from there, Do you dispute what it says and that it is in line with my point?
You are slipping old man
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 11:34 PM
|
#42
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Had Odumbo liberally used the pronouns "they" and "we" instead of repeatedly saying "I", he would have fared better in their eyes.
|
On that we agree!
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 11:40 PM
|
#43
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ansley
I think that President Obama handled it all wrong. I'm sure the lack the words "they and "we" chapped their butts to no end. Maybe I am a bit old school, because of the influences that I have had, but I don't think military should go around disrespecting a President.
|
They're "former" military. They have a right to speak their mind now that they are out of uniform. JFK, Carter and Kerry all used their military records to run for office. Kerry certainly didn't hold his tongue when speaking against W. The real crux is Obama denigrated their service -- 20 to 30 years of their lives -- during his apology tour. By doing so, Obama broke a bond of trust with many if not most service members while simultaneously seeking to take all of the credit for their prowess in arms. BTW, regarding "old school": study Democrat candidate for president General George McClellan. You'll discover, "What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." Oh, and Democrat candidate General Andrew Jackson spoke most unflatteringly of President John Q. Adams.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
10-23-2012, 11:41 PM
|
#44
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
No but I got the quoted material from there, Do you dispute what it says and that it is in line with my point?
You are slipping old man
|
As a matter of fact, I do. I don't think you read the book, and I think you have no idea what it means. I'm surprised you can even spell "Adam Smith" let alone understand his philosophy.
And you got almost your entire post from there. You cut and paste more than the quoted material, and tried to pass it off as your own. And I think you've done that more than once.
You've been exposed as a fraud and a buffoon.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
10-24-2012, 12:52 AM
|
#45
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
As a matter of fact, I do. I don't think you read the book, and I think you have no idea what it means. I'm surprised you can even spell "Adam Smith" let alone understand his philosophy.
And you got almost your entire post from there. You cut and paste more than the quoted material, and tried to pass it off as your own. And I think you've done that more than once.
You've been exposed as a fraud and a buffoon.
![Mf Flush](https://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilies/modern/mf_Flush.gif)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
It was in the TMS that Smith first referred to the "invisible hand" to describe the apparent benefits to society of people behaving in their own interests. Smith writes (6th ed. p. 350
.
|
You think I tried to pass a quote off as my own? Or the highlighted notation?
WTF is wrong with you?
People vote in their own best interest. That is human nature. I used Adam Smith as a example. If you disagree with that , you do not know shit about human nature! We all act in what we precieve to be our best intrest. Except you of course! You are the exception , in your simple mind.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|