Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70795
biomed163280
Yssup Rider61003
gman4453295
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48665
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42682
CryptKicker37220
The_Waco_Kid37070
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2023, 07:56 PM   #31
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,924
Encounters: 2
Default

Goodness. The world must be so simple for Blackman and TS Mokies. All they have to remember is "Democrat Good, Republican Bad." And then everything falls into place.

I've been following this thread but didn't have time to post. I figured I was going to have to come over here and kick some ass. But Lusty Lad's already done that for me. And DucButter applied the final shot to the head.

A couple of additional comments, federal receipts as a % of GDP in fiscal 2022, 19.2%, were the fourth highest in the history of the United States of America:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFRGDA188S

And despite a cut in the federal corporate rate from 35% to 21%, federal tax receipts on corporate income in fiscal 2022 were the highest since 2014:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FCTAX

You can't attribute this to tax increases during the Biden administration. In fact, despite controlling the presidency, Senate and House, I don't believe the Democrats rescinded any of the provisions of the Republicans' 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). They actually extended some that were due to expire! And their only significant tax increase, the minimum tax on corporate income, didn't start until January 1, 2023.

So close-to-record high revenues were achieved with a tax regime last altered by the Republicans' TCJA. However, contrary to what Blackman says, I don’t believe tax revenues normally go up when tax rates are lowered. Although it wouldn't surprise me if the longer term revenue-maximizing rate from the federal corporate tax is lower than the 35% that was in effect before the TCJA. And the revenue maximizing rate for capital gains is almost certainly lower than the 43.4% that Biden was pushing.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 08:09 PM   #32
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,070
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Goodness. The world must be so simple for Blackman and TS Mokies. All they have to remember is "Democrat Good, Republican Bad." And then everything falls into place.

I've been following this thread but didn't have time to post. I figured I was going to have to come over here and kick some ass. But Lusty Lad's already done that for me. And DucButter applied the final shot to the head.

A couple of additional comments, federal receipts as a % of GDP in fiscal 2022, 19.2%, were the third highest in the history of the United States of America:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFRGDA188S

And despite a cut in the federal corporate rate from 35% to 21%, federal tax receipts on corporate income in fiscal 2022 were the highest since 2014:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FCTAX

You can't attribute this to tax increases during the Biden administration. In fact, despite controlling the presidency, Senate and House, I don't believe the Democrats rescinded any of the provisions of the Republicans' 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). They actually extended some that were due to expire! And their only significant tax increase, the minimum tax on corporate income, didn't start until January 1, 2023.

So close-to-record high revenues were achieved with a tax regime last altered by the Republicans' TCJA. That's not to say lower rates necessarily result in higher tax revenues. Although it wouldn't surprise me if the longer term revenue-maximizing rate from the federal corporate tax is lower than the 35% that was in effect before the TCJA.



i'm TWK and i double like this post
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 08:22 PM   #33
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,924
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
i'm TWK and i double like this post
Haha! That's where those two likes came from
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 08:38 PM   #34
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,070
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsmokies View Post
The gop tax cuts increase revenue for the wealthy and corporations that own the gop. And...of course fucked the working people. Good thing megas are all wealthy or just too stupid to get a clue. Wonder which it is

if you say so

IRS data proves Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/...mericans-most/


President Biden and congressional Democrats’ Build Back Better (BBB) Act is now in the hands of the Senate. That legislative body’s 50-50 partisan split will undoubtedly make the bill’s passage difficult.


In order for BBB to become law, Democratic Senate leadership will need to convince moderates such as Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) that the legislation’s $2.4 trillion price tag can be offset by expanding the IRS and its enforcement efforts while imposing substantial tax reform measures.


Congressional Democrats have argued that one of the best ways to pay for the legislation is to raise taxes on wealthy households, which, according to many on the left, have benefited disproportionately and unfairly from the 2017 tax reform law passed by Republicans and signed by former President Trump. The latest data, however, proves that this claim is pure mythology.


Income data published by the IRS clearly show that on average all income brackets benefited substantially from the Republicans’ tax reform law, with the biggest beneficiaries being working and middle-income filers, not the top 1 percent, as so many Democrats have argued.


A careful analysis of the IRS tax data, one that includes the effects of tax credits and other reforms to the tax code, shows that filers with an adjusted gross income (AGI) of $15,000 to $50,000 enjoyed an average tax cut of 16 percent to 26 percent in 2018, the first year Republicans’ Tax Cuts and Jobs Act went into effect and the most recent year for which data is available.


Filers who earned $50,000 to $100,000 received a tax break of about 15 percent to 17 percent, and those earning $100,000 to $500,000 in adjusted gross income saw their personal income taxes cut by around 11 percent to 13 percent.


By comparison, no income group with an AGI of at least $500,000 received an average tax cut exceeding 9 percent, and the average tax cut for brackets starting at $1 million was less than 6 percent. (For more detailed data, see my table published here.)


That means most middle-income and working-class earners enjoyed a tax cut that was at least double the size of tax cuts received by households earning $1 million or more.


What’s more, IRS data shows earners in higher income brackets contributed a bigger slice of the total income tax revenue pie following the passage of the tax reform law than they had in the previous year.


In fact, every income bracket with filers earning $200,000 or more increased its tax burden in 2018 compared to 2017, and every income bracket with a top limit lower than $200,000 paid a smaller proportion of the total personal tax revenue collected.


That means that Republicans’ tax reform law resulted in the tax code becoming slightly more progressive — the exact opposite of what Democrats have claimed over the past four years.


The IRS data further shows that the tax reform law — which included a variety of business tax cuts, including a large reduction in the corporate income tax rate — spurred economic mobility.


Every income bracket with a top level lower than $25,000 experienced a reduction in its number of filers, and every income bracket above $25,000 increased in size, with the biggest gains occurring in the brackets with a floor of at least $100,000.


The fact is, Republicans’ 2017 tax reform law did exactly what was promised: It lowered taxes for all income groups, provided the greatest benefits for middle-income households, and spurred economic growth that helped reduce poverty and improve prosperity.


It would be a grave mistake for Democrats to eliminate key parts of this important legislation.


Justin Haskins (Jhaskins@heartland.org) is director of the Socialism Research Center at The Heartland Institute and the co-author, with Glenn Beck, of the forthcoming book “The Great Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of 21st Century Fascism.”
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 04-28-2023, 08:58 PM   #35
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,097
Default

... Crikey! ... Look at that!

The tax cuts greatly helped the middle class.
Just as President Trump said they would! ...

### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 04-29-2023, 05:18 AM   #36
farmstud60
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 3,164
Encounters: 25
Default

The problem with too many is they think all income is like a salary and thus changing tax rates only affects amount of revenue collected by the Federal Government.


Our tax code is so complicated that using a static analysis is worse than stupid.
farmstud60 is offline   Quote
Old 04-29-2023, 05:39 AM   #37
Why_Yes_I_Do
Valued Poster
 
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2013
Location: Railroad Tracks, other side thereof
Posts: 7,147
Encounters: 14
Default <...raises hand...> Couldn't the governement just spend less?

Seems like that would reduce the amount of taxes needed.
Why_Yes_I_Do is offline   Quote
Old 04-29-2023, 09:09 PM   #38
Ducbutter
Valued Poster
 
Ducbutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 25, 2012
Location: Ahead of you.
Posts: 856
Encounters: 1
Default

What is rather amusing about this thread is that Blkmn knew he had no basis for his claims, he was only slinging mud and hoping no one would call him on it. Even an attorney should recognize that a 30% reduction in tax revenue would be catastrophic. Seems to me he's spouting stuff he doesn't really believe. I thought that was bad?
Ducbutter is offline   Quote
Old 04-30-2023, 07:42 AM   #39
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,065
Encounters: 41
Default

Is a reduction year over year of 75 billion in collected tax revenue an increase or decrease?

Asking for a mathematician friend.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 04-30-2023, 07:33 PM   #40
Ducbutter
Valued Poster
 
Ducbutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 25, 2012
Location: Ahead of you.
Posts: 856
Encounters: 1
Default

Yeah, run with that.
Ducbutter is offline   Quote
Old 04-30-2023, 08:32 PM   #41
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,065
Encounters: 41
Default

So you don’t know whether being less is a reduction? I thought you at least knew basic mathematical concepts.

Revenue and collections last year this time > revenue and collections this year this time. Is this untrue?
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 04-30-2023, 09:54 PM   #42
Ducbutter
Valued Poster
 
Ducbutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 25, 2012
Location: Ahead of you.
Posts: 856
Encounters: 1
Default

If your mathematician friend knew anything about statistics he'd have told you it was almost a 100% certainty receipts would fall so it's meaningless. And if they were any kind of actual friend they would tell you to quit being obtuse. You can keep showing your ass here but I think everyone who's followed the thread kmows you have nothing.
I'm out.
Ducbutter is offline   Quote
Old 05-01-2023, 06:00 AM   #43
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,065
Encounters: 41
Default

Bye sucka, don’t let the doorknob hit ya . . .
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 05-01-2023, 06:23 AM   #44
Why_Yes_I_Do
Valued Poster
 
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 26, 2013
Location: Railroad Tracks, other side thereof
Posts: 7,147
Encounters: 14
Default We could afford to spend less...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
Is a reduction year over year of 75 billion in collected tax revenue an increase or decrease?

Asking for a mathematician friend.
Is a reduction year over year of 75 billion in spending a good or bad thing? Can we do it again? Yes Please!

Asking for a tax paying friend.
Why_Yes_I_Do is offline   Quote
Old 05-01-2023, 01:57 PM   #45
Texas Contrarian
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,331
Default But, hey, why let a few facts get in the way when progressives have a partisan axe to grind?

Here are a couple of additional points I would make about the recent tax revenue trajectory, taken in context.

For starters, if government's pockets appear to be thinning, that's due to skyrocketing levels of spending, not inadequate tax revenue. As lustylad noted, revenue grew at a virtually unprecedented rate in FY2021 and FY2022, ballooning from about $3.4T to an annual run rate of approximately $4.9T.

Then consider the timing of the effects of the multiple covid relief and stimulus packages of 2020-2021, especially the $1.9T ARP passed in March 2021. There's little disagreement with the view that total "relief and stimulus" spending was several trillion dollars in excess of what was needed to fill the output gap. As JP Morgan analysts noted in midyear 2021, this resulted in "excess savings" in household accounts of about $2.5T.

A first-order result was the unsustainable 5.7% headline GDP growth rate in calendar 2021, when consumers eager to get back to "normal" as the pandemic was winding down created pent-up demand for all manner of goods and services. This prompted various liberal commentators like Heather Cox Richardson and a number of others to write that it's "morning in America" again, and the economy is roaring. (No, it wasn't!)

But second- and higher-order effects naturally start to appear as that enormous pile of savings gets spent down and the apparently "roaring" economy begins to slow. That's what we're seeing now, as some consumption that under more normal circumstances might be occurring this year got pulled back into prior periods.

Consequently, a number of LEI components and other indicators have been weakening over the last 9-12 months. Earnings guidance numbers in many industries across wide swaths of the economy have also been on the decline in recent months.

When a tsunami of unsustainable stimulus measures are poured into an economy, creating an artificial boom, why is anyone surprised when government tax collections soon weaken by a few percentage points?
Texas Contrarian is online now   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved