WHY IS THERE NO LIBERAL AYN RAND ???

[WTF]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

now you want my sausage..maybe you are gay

im leaving it to you..have to go play golf and then dinner

I would say hit'em straight but we all know you are gay!

I played nine this morning. Shot a 38. Feeling pretty good about myself right about now!

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by WTF

I would say hit'em straight but we all know you are gay!

I played nine this morning. Shot a 38. Feeling pretty good about myself right about now!

not bad for the first 3 holes, parctice practice practice

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by WTF

I would say hit'em straight but we all know you are gay!

I played nine this morning. Shot a 38. Feeling pretty good about myself right about now!

wtf ... if you are ever in the Tyler area, or want to take a weekend golf vacation with a couple of friends, this was one of my favorite places to play ... Little Augusta, seriously.


http://www.gardenvalleytx.com/


carved out a 73 ... had a stiffie all the way back to Big D

[CuteOldGuy]

Noam Chomsky is an idiot if he thinks Jefferson advocated for a highly progressive income tax. I don't believe it. He spoke about property taxes in a letter to Madison, but that was concerning property inequality in France. Chomsky is taking things out of context and making stuff up. Like many on here do.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Noam Chomsky is an idiot if he thinks Jefferson advocated for a highly progressive income tax. I don't believe it. He spoke about property taxes in a letter to Madison, but that was concerning property inequality in France. Chomsky is taking things out of context and making stuff up. Like many on here do.

Chomsky is a blatant liar -- that makes him a blatant idiot.

[theaustinescorts]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

One of the authors – a Chomsky peer – on that list is Oliver Kamm: a very vocal critic of Chomsky and his work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Kamm

January 26, 2005
Chomsky and the Vietnam War - a study in propaganda

In my comment about Noam Chomsky earlier this week, I advanced three propositions. First, his central political notion is not about Vietnam, or Timor, or Palestine: it is that the US is equivalent to Nazi Germany. Secondly, his handling of source material is dishonest. Thirdly, these characteristics are not recent developments, but date back to his earliest political writings. In this post I shall provide an example that illustrates all these points simultaneously. . . .
http://oliverkamm.typepad.com/blog/2...and_the_1.html


Another on that list is Samuel P. Huntington – an original source – that Chomsky purposefully misquotes:

A Frustrating Task
February 26, 1970
In response to:

After Pinkville from the January 1, 1970 issue

To the Editors:

In the space of three brief paragraphs in your January 1 issue, Noam Chomsky manages to mutilate the truth in a variety of ways with respect to my views and activities on Vietnam.

. . . . By omitting my next sentence—”Peace in the immediate future must hence be based on accommodation”—and linking my statement about the Viet Cong to two other phrases which appear earlier in the article, Mr. Chomsky completely reversed my argument. (Incidentally, the phrase “direct application of mechanical and conventional power” is not mine, but one which I quote from Sir Robert Thompson. Mr. Chomsky, however, does not see fit to recognize these distinctions of authorship.) . . . .
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/arch...strating-task/


And then there is the eminent scholar Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.’s analysis at:
http://www.paulbogdanor.com/chomsky/schlesinger.pdf

Here’s an excerpt:

Having taken a course from the now dead Sam Huntington, who I knew a little, I can tell you he wasn't well respected among his peers or colleagues. He was a gross exaggerator and polemicist in the mold of other Harvard morons like Nadav Safran, Henry Kissenger, Laurie Mylroie, and countless others. And that was well before he blew up what little prestige he had left by publishing "Clash of Civilizations," which spelled the end of his career.

Harvard's international affairs faculty is the most aweful and least peer-reviewed of any. MIT on the other hand has Lucien Pye, Stephen Miller, Stephen Meyer, and a host of real scholars [not political hacks and liars like Harvard] who's papers are all peer-reviewed.

MIT is the publisher of International Security, the world's foremost national security journal. Harvard has nothing.

As for the other toads you put forth [like the political hack Arthur Schesinger] who allege Chomsky lies, they are similar midgets and liars themselves.

Chomsky has been ACCUSED of lying by disreputable scoundrels, but has never
been proven to have lied about anything by any distinguished, peer-reviewed scholar.\

Chomsky is the founder of modern linguistics.

He is the Einstein or Fineman of his field.

He is without question the highest of academicians when it comes to integrity, whether you agree with his analysis or not.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by CJ7

wtf ... if you are ever in the Tyler area, or want to take a weekend golf vacation with a couple of friends, this was one of my favorite places to play ... Little Augusta, seriously.


http://www.gardenvalleytx.com/


carved out a 73 ... had a stiffie all the way back to Big D

Me likey allot. Will check it out come Fall. To hot to play this month!

I play early morning and mostly just 9 holes when it is this hot.

[theaustinescorts]

Watch Chomsky skewer Bill Buckley with the facts about Vietnam in the 1960s.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k9aTeoDBxw


Buckley can do nothing more than hurl insults at Chomsky because he's been run circles around with the truth.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by WTF

Me likey allot. Will check it out come Fall. To hot to play this month!

I play early morning and mostly just 9 holes when it is this hot.

plan on 36, pal. and take an extra sleeve of eggs .. or two

the first 18 is a learning experience and a visual experience, ..

the 2nd 18 is war to make up for the first trip ... you'll love it

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

Having taken a course from the now dead Sam Huntington, who I knew a little, I can tell you he wasn't well respected among his peers or colleagues. He was a gross exaggerator and polemicist in the mold of other Harvard morons like Nadav Safran, Henry Kissenger, Laurie Mylroie, and countless others.Your response doesn't diminish the lie Chomsky perpetuated by deliberately misquoting Huntington.

Harvard's international affairs faculty is the most aweful and least peer-reviewed of any. MIT on the other hand has Lucien Pye, Stephen Miller, Stephen Meyer, and a host of real scholars [not political hacks and liars] who's papers are all peer-reviewed.

MIT is the publisher of International Security, the world's foremost national security journal. Harvard has nothing.

As for the other toads you put forth who allege Chomsky lies, they are similar midgets and liars themselves.

Chomsky has been ACCUSED of lying by disreputable scoundrels, but has never
been proven to have lied about anything by any distinguished, peer-reviewed scholar.\

Chomsky is the founder of modern linguistics.

He is the Einstein or Fineman of his field. Only when that field remains "linguistics". When Chomsky ventures into politics and history, Huntington, Schlesinger, Kamm and others have called him what he is: a liar.

He is without question the highest of acdemians when it comes to integrity, whether you agree with his analysis or not. Chomsky deliberately lies, misquotes and omits pertinent, mitigating information in order to further deceive the ignorant and misinformed. Chomsky has no integrity.

.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Chomsky is a blatant liar -- that makes him a blatant idiot.

are you sure, an idiot? he maybe a blantant liar, but he's a brilliant one. look at how many he's managed to fob off his lies on. I'd say that's brilliant.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

Watch Chomsky skewer Bill Buckley with the facts about Vietnam in the 1960s.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k9aTeoDBxw


Buckley can do nothing more than hurl insults at Chomsky because he's been run circles around with the truth.

Did you post the right video? No one was skewered in this. It was a pretty reasonable discussion. Buckley was no more obnoxious than usual, but he held his own, as did Chomsky.

You need a reality check.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

are you sure, an idiot? he maybe a blantant liar, but he's a brilliant one. look at how many he's managed to fob off his lies on. I'd say that's brilliant.

Only an idiot would so unabashedly state such easily reputed lies. But, another author makes the same claim you do: "America’s Dumbest Intellectual" by Stefan Kanfer @ http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_...cas_dumbe.html

Foreign Policy’s Daniel W. Drezner writes: "Noam Chomsky, egomaniacal liar" @ http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2005/03/24/noam_chomsky_egomaniacal_liar

A young intern, Peter Seabrook (defending author Daniel Flynn) writes: "Chomsky: Scholar or Sap?" @ http://www.academia.org/chomsky-scholar-or-sap/

Here is a particularly revealing book review:
http://www.sydneyline.com/Anti-Chomsky%20Reader.html

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Only an idiot would so unabashedly state such easily reputed lies. But, another author makes the same claim you do: "America’s Dumbest Intellectual" by Stefan Kanfer @ http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_...cas_dumbe.html

Foreign Policy’s Daniel W. Drezner writes: "Noam Chomsky, egomaniacal liar" @ http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2005/03/24/noam_chomsky_egomaniacal_liar

A young intern, Peter Seabrook (defending author Daniel Flynn) writes: "Chomsky: Scholar or Sap?" @ http://www.academia.org/chomsky-scholar-or-sap/

Here is a particularly revealing book review:
http://www.sydneyline.com/Anti-Chomsky%20Reader.html

point taken.

chomsky is a yellow bellied sap sucker!