Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
645 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
389 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
273 |
George Spelvin |
260 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70672 | biomed1 | 62316 | Yssup Rider | 60189 | gman44 | 53215 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48371 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41213 | CryptKicker | 37175 | Mokoa | 36491 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | The_Waco_Kid | 35624 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
03-05-2012, 04:09 PM
|
#46
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Doofus is 'creeped out' by a ‘guy’ flirting with a ‘woman’ on a SHMB?!? Really? That Doofus 'dude(?)' needs some serious psychological help.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2012, 05:43 PM
|
#47
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
Correct, I misspoke. The scenario lacks so much credibility the judges wont even ALLOW it to go to TRIAL.
Better?
|
No.
"Standing" means that before someone can sue successfully, they must show that they have been or will be harmed. SO FAR, nobody has managed to make a good enough case, and Obama's motions for dismissal for lack of standing have been uniformly successful. Hillary Clinton would certainly have had standing to sue, when she was running against Obama for the nomination. McCain would certainly have had standing, as the Republican candidate for President. The eventual Republican nominee will have standing. I do not know whether a Libertarian or SWP Presidential candidate would be seen to have standing: a liberal Democrat judge might well rule that the guy had no chance of being elected anyway, and so dismissal of the case came under "no harm, no foul".
Also, even if you can persuade a judge that you have standing, there may be other problems. There was a case in Alabama recently. The judge threw it out because Alabama state law explicitly forbids the Alabama courts from examining the question of whether a nominee for office actually meets the requirements for nomination. The political parties are, essentially, on the honor system...
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-05-2012, 05:45 PM
|
#48
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidewinder
The political parties are, essentially, on the honor system...
|
God help us.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-06-2012, 03:35 PM
|
#49
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidewinder
No.
"Standing" means that before someone can sue successfully, they must show that they have been or will be harmed. SO FAR, nobody has managed to make a good enough case, and Obama's motions for dismissal for lack of standing have been uniformly successful. Hillary Clinton would certainly have had standing to sue, when she was running against Obama for the nomination. McCain would certainly have had standing, as the Republican candidate for President. The eventual Republican nominee will have standing. I do not know whether a Libertarian or SWP Presidential candidate would be seen to have standing: a liberal Democrat judge might well rule that the guy had no chance of being elected anyway, and so dismissal of the case came under "no harm, no foul".
Also, even if you can persuade a judge that you have standing, there may be other problems. There was a case in Alabama recently. The judge threw it out because Alabama state law explicitly forbids the Alabama courts from examining the question of whether a nominee for office actually meets the requirements for nomination. The political parties are, essentially, on the honor system...
|
Thank you, Your Honor. I cede to your sheepskin.
wasnt it one of Hillarys minions that started that BC rumor-email when she was looking for the nonimation? Standing, notwithstanding?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-06-2012, 03:55 PM
|
#50
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
If sheriff Joe unvales the truth he will look like a fool.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-06-2012, 06:36 PM
|
#51
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekim008
If sheriff Joe unvales the truth he will look like a fool.
|
HUH?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
03-06-2012, 07:09 PM
|
#52
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekim008
If sheriff Joe unvales the truth he will look like a fool.
|
woops unveil sorry
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-06-2012, 08:54 PM
|
#53
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 3,631
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekim008
woops unveil sorry
|
still HUH?
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-07-2012, 11:21 AM
|
#54
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekim008
woops unveil sorry
|
I got it Ekim ... true that.
however, you may want to type slow and stop using big words ... it confuses some.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-07-2012, 03:30 PM
|
#55
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
And Ekum doesn't understand them.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
03-08-2012, 02:03 PM
|
#56
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,249
|
Arpaio is an attention-whore. And, as it turns out, the lead investigator on this nonsense co-wrote a book with Jerome Corsi about the loony-tune birther argument that Obama's birth certificate is a fake. He has a profit motive on the outcome of the investigation. Finally, according to local Arizona news sources, the vast majority of the "information" relied upon by the dim-witted sheriff came from Corsi.
Stunning police work.
http://www.azfamily.com/news/MCSO-in...141270873.html
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-08-2012, 03:23 PM
|
#57
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Dilbert, Sheriff Joe found probable cause that the birth certificate presented by the administration is a forgery. He is continuing his investigation.
|
translation;
the goodly sheriff will never mention the BC again.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
03-09-2012, 05:54 AM
|
#58
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
And Ekum doesn't understand them.
|
well i will always have you to explain them to me cute old fart.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|