If the argument is, you can't trust a candidate because they did "this or that", it is perfectly appropriate to ask if the other candidate did the same thing, unless of course you want to hide facts from the American people like Democrats are so desperately doing in the Bobulinski affair.
By using "RACIST", the Democrats think they can sweep shit away with another of their favorite words, "whataboutism".
When I said
Quote:
|
So what does one do when both candidates "appear to have "issues" and lie"?
|
I addressed the Walker situation which is what you must do to avoid "whataboutism". Once you have addressed the subject you are free to move on to a comparison of the candidates. It is only when one fails to address the original topic, that being Walker and makes a comparison without addressing Walker do you get into whataboutism territory but as we can see, this is very, very difficult for Democrats to understand.
In simple terms, refusal to address Walker and moving on to Warnock IS the very definition of "whataboutism".
I'll give you an example for those of you still riding on the "short bus". If you write "Trump lied" and I write "Biden lied too" that would be whataboutism. But if I acknowledge that Trump lied, addressing the claim, not hiding behind it, I can then make the comparison.
Lesson over not that I think it will do a bit of good.
Let's see how this plays out
